Rants 'n Raves

Remember when Obama outlined his cap-and-trade energy plan, which caps emissions for corporations and allows for the trade and auction of credits to emit greenhouse gasses? And how he said that building coal power plants would most likely "bankrupt" energy corporations and investors? And when he said, "How my plan will necessarily cause energy prices to skyrocket"?

Now EPA czar, Lisa P. Jackson, is taking up Obama's cause. "Let me be clear," Ms. Jackson said during a phone call with reporters. "This is not about ending coal mining. This is about ending coal mining pollution."

Also, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson just announced a new set of automobile guidelines - a program that aims to cut carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles by 30 to 40 per percent. LaHood said the new guidelines will "benefit the planet", and that "it's just the right thing to do for the environment."

Lisa Jackson (like Obama with healthcare, and who also wants to be remembered as someone famous), called the new guidelines "historic".

Why does everyone in Obama's administration and all the Progressive Democrats want to make history?

And this is scary...

(From her own Bio)

Lisa P. Jackson, the first African-American to serve as EPA Administrator, is using 17,000 "professionals" to FORCE a "green economy" on America (think of Van Jones). And just like Obama, she has promised "unparalleled transparency". *cough* *clear throat*

One of her core issues is reducing greenhouse gases - even though "Climate-gate" and Al Gore have both been proven to be frauds perpetuated on the American people. Lisa Jackson is using the EPA as an ideological tool to advocate the radical Progressive's agenda to redistribute wealth. She has made it a priority to focus on low-income communities who, as stated in the bio, "are particularly susceptible to environmental threats." (Would she be referring to ethnic minorities living in inner cities, or whites living in trailer homes in rural areas?)

This presidential administration and the current Congress has been primarily focused on litigation and laws to specifically benefit ethnic minorities; and their "euro-empathizers" all throughout our government have been pushing a "social justice" system that is radically changing the U.S. economy.

Healthcare was only the beginning. They will push as hard and as fast as they can to get as much pushed through as the they possibly can before they lose their power in Washington. Immigration "reform", cap-and-trade, and other socialistic policies imposed on American citizens.

The ACLU sympathizers in the White House, and those that have infiltrated our Federal, State, and local governments, are deliberately focusing governmental policies to benefit African-American and Pan-American people (blacks and Hispanics) living in the United States. Righting past "wrongs" done by the "white oppressors".

It's been so damn obvious, but even the most politically conservative and outspoken figures (such as Rush Limbaugh) have been too reluctant to point out this very glaring and obvious fact, for fear of being labeled a racist or of frivolously being accused of inciting hate and violence.

The Progressive left-wing terrorists from the 1960's hi-jacked the liberal's Utopian idea of "justice" and have convinced ethnic minorities that white people who want smaller government and less intrusion into their lives, are really just radical far-right wing pro-Hitler Aryan racists. This is ridiculous. They, the new-left-wing "liberals", want white people to be intimidated and to remain silent. To be more "tolerant".

Reverse discrimination is already rampant in America, using corporate and government "diversity" policies in their hiring practices (disguising them in a form of affirmative action).

Just one such example is the MGM Mirage in Las Vegas, the largest employer in the State of Nevada. The Las Vegas Sun reported that over 50% of their employees were "ethnic minorities", yet the actual demographics of Las Vegas is 75% white...in a city that has 13.2% unemployment and has one of the highest rates of illegal immigration in the nation. And labor unions promote this, and are advocating "amnesty" for illegals as I write this.

They want ME to practice "tolerance" when I'm unjustly discriminated against?

Sonia Sotomayor: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white man."

See "Diversity and Illegal Hiring Practices"

Does not 75% of the population (whites that are the majority) deserve to be represented by the 25% who are now in power and/or are empathizers of ethnic minorities? These past 15 months has been a blatant "racist power grab". Ironic that they point their fingers at the majority and accuse them of racism when in fact, IT IS THEY who have been using the power of government to pass or enact racist laws and social policies...AGAINST WHITES! That's ACLU's exact blue print for their version "fairness" - punish Caucasians and give more benefits ("subsidies") to minorities.

What happened to "blind justice"?

The Obama Zombies (the millennium generation) that voted Obama into office and support these policies are blindly giving away fair opportunities for themselves in their own futures..but they are just too gullible (or indoctrinated) to realize this.

Redistribution of wealth from the "rich" (those who create jobs for the masses, build schools and houses, give to charities, fund scientific innovation, and advance civilization in general), and giving to the poor (many who do nothing but have babies and are on welfare from the cradle to the grave, from one generation to another, hence the high rate of single mothers and crime rates in poor inner-cities.)

Will this help solve the disproportionate amount of ethnic minorities who join gangs, commit crimes, and end up in the prison system?

There are a lot of poor white people on welfare in America who commit violent crimes, but I'm not one of them - and raising my taxes to give money to them in the form of "Obama-Care" does not make me very happy either. Redistribution of my wealth, or as Obama would say, "spreading the wealth around" will only tear this country apart and destroy any reason at all why someone would ever want to risk their life to live here.

Maybe in 40 years Canada will see a massive rise in immigration from the United States... from minority white people!

What's odd is, whites are already a minority in the world (mostly in North America and Europe). The United States just happens to be one of a few that is "white dominated" by it's majority of the population (see Africa, Asia, and Indonesia). But why is it that some believe that NO "white" countries should exist? Just like with radical Islam, who believe ALL Christians (also a minority) are infidels and should die...and that ALL peoples should be of Muslim faith. Where's their tolerance?

When was the last time a "white nation" oppressed a "country of color"? Did America "oppress" the Japanese after the end of World War II? Apartheid in South Africa was a minority of whites over a majority of the indigenous people.

But given the chance, there are a few countries that would like to destroy America (including our ethnic population).

Yes, our Euro-American Caucasian fore-fathers of this country may have once thought that blacks were not completely "human". But once the Egyptians though their leaders were gods; the Pope once believed the earth was flat; the Nazi's believed they were superior; the Spanish enslaved and murdered Aztecs (Mexicans); and Al Gore had many believing that Florida was soon going to be under the ocean. But human civilization has come a long way since then - we've become more advanced in our way of thinking.

Racism, bigotry, sexism, and ignorance has always existed with humankind - but we, as people, are getting better and far more enlightened...and becoming more humane. And the United States has led the way - but Obama and his ideologies will only turn the clock backwards with special promises to enlist, then use, minorities to advance his own personal beliefs in socialistic government policies - programs that, in the long run, will harm all people of all races. Luring minorities with "free stuff" (subsidies), will hurt them more in the long-term...and a good job in a thriving economy is always much better (I'll buy my own healthcare, thank you).

There is no "Obama Stash".

Kevin Jackson, the Conservative author of the critically acclaimed book The Big Black Lie, is also the author of The Black Sphere Blog, and the host of The Black Sphere Radio.

"Democrat Congressman Emanuel Cleaver would like Obama to create jobs for black people in his city. Obviously Cleaver is high from breathing the toxic fumes of hope and change. Obama can’t create jobs for white folks, so how on God’s green earth will he create jobs for black folks?! Maybe Cleaver expects stimulus for bail bondsmen, BBQ joints, and hair salons?" ~ Kevin Jackson

See my post "Progressives" are Really Racist Marxists"

It's probably already too late for my generation (to either suffer from Obama's changes or to see the minorities benefit from them) - but as I write this, it's only to warn the next generation (of ALL races living in the United States)..."Save this country now so you'll have a happy and prosperous future for yourself and your family."

Obama, Eric Holder, and all the Obama "czars" like Lisa Jackson are destroying the true exceptionalism of America.

Otherwise, study Russian and Chinese history for a preview of things to come. Or better yet, read up on Liberia - a country in Africa that was founded and colonized by freed American slaves. Read about their civil war that left hundreds of thousands of people dead and devastated the country's economy.

(And if you listen to and believe what Alan Colmes ever says, then you are a racist imbecile...and I mean no disrespect to imbeciles.)

My next "racist" analysis: Unprovoked Assaults

Why am I constantly being attacked every day by numerous unprovoked assaults on my ear drums with the sound of drums emanating from huge speakers in the back of people's cars (and elsewhere)? Especially when I'm peacefully relaxing at home (minding my own business) - just laying on my couch and trying to watch the History Channel? Wouldn't it be more respectful if they turned the volume down when they arrived inside a quiet and peaceful neighborhood? Am I a racist because I don't appreciate it when my walls and windows tremble with the loud throbbing sounds that vibrate through the community air waves? Isn't this a violation of my Civil Rights? Wouldn't this imposition on me by them be "socially unjust"?

Especially when they're blaring Hip Hop or Gangsta Rap, when I prefer Classic Rock

Maybe that's the answer to world peace...turn down your stereo!

See my other "racist" posts:

Sonia Sotomayor
http://tobuds.com/blogs/blog3.php/2009/07/03/sonia-sotomayor

Is Michelle Obama Prejudice?
http://tobuds.com/blogs/blog1.php/2009/09/10/is-michelle-obama-prejudice

Larry Whitten - "Please Speak English!"
http://tobuds.com/blogs/blog1.php/2009/10/27/larry-whitten-speak-english-please

Charlie Rangel - From Slavery to the Present
http://tobuds.com/blogs/blog1.php/2009/09/16/charlie-rangel-from-slavery-to-the-prese

Racism and The Dust Bowl
http://tobuds.com/blogs/blog5.php/2009/09/13/race-and-the-dust-bowl

Mexico's Border
http://tobuds.com/blogs/blog1.php/2009/06/28/mexico-s-border

Ancestral Ties to Slavery
http://tobuds.com/blogs/blog5.php/2009/09/12/ancestral-ties-to-slavery

(Excerpted and edited by Bud Meyers from "Charlie Rangel’s Draft Obsession", the original article by Jim Kouri

Also read: "Charlie Rangel - From Slavery to the Present"

Charlie Rangel and members of the Congressional Black Caucus had once complained that Blacks were being used as "cannon fodder" in the Iraq war, until they were confronted with the fact that only five percent (5%) of the troops in Iraq were African-Americans, while 14% of the US population are black. Rangel backed off from making that allegation when speaking with whites, yet he continues to use the canard when speaking to black audiences.

Some things never change. Back in 1966 Charlie was the general counsel to the National Advisory Commission on Selective Service (The U.S. military draft board - when troops were being sent to Viet Nam.) He had argued then that a supposedly disproportionate amount of "Afro-Americans" were being drafted into the Viet Nam War.

"This is vintage Charlie Rangel. He’s adept at distortion and his proposed draft in 2003 wasn’t meant to improve the military, but to create a Vietnam era military of draftees. Anyone who knows anything about the military knows that conscription brings about negative results," says former Marine intelligence officer and NYPD detective Sid Francis, himself an African-American.

In addition, most men and women in today’s military come from middle- and upper-middle class families.

Republicans understood Rangel’s motive for calling for a renewed draft. He had been opposed to all military actions undertaken by the Bush Administration and was a vocal opponent of the Iraq war, but he saw an opportunity to undermine the military by infusing it with draftees who didn’t want to fight. He is also aware that conscription creates civil discord.

"Rangel’s draft was part and parcel of a "class warfare" strategy that the Democrat Party uses to divide the country," said a high-ranking military officer.

Rangel’s critics pointed out that he has a penchant for making outrageous statements and if he’s asked to reiterate them on television or radio, he backs off from those comments with tepid excuses. For instance, in a speech in Harlem in New York City, Rangel said that President Bush is "our Bull Connor" a reference to the southern sheriff who used attack dogs on civil-rights protesters. Rangel, however, failed to mention that Sheriff Connor was a Democrat.

Let’s take a look at the real Charlie Rangel as evidenced in a little known story of how a New York City detective knocked the robust politician on his keister following the utterance of a Rangelism in the 1960s:

Sidney was one of New York City’s first African-American detectives. In fact, he was so good at policing in the city’s toughest neighborhoods, that he was promoted to the coveted rank of 1st Grade Detective in the NYPD, the youngest in New York’s history. A former Marine - one of the first blacks to be accepted into the Marine Corps in 1945 - Sid was your consummate police officer. Tough, relentless and proud, Sid tempered his tough street persona with intelligence and a sense of fairness that won the respect of his superiors, his fellow cops and the citizens he served. Sid came from a black family of achievement with one brother becoming a police captain and another serving as a colonel in the US Army.

Sidney saw action in Korea at about the same time as Charlie Rangel took to the battlefield with the US Army. While Rangel brags about his military service and being awarded a Purple Heart for wounds he received, Sid believed a good marine does the wounding and killing not the other way around. He openly admired General George Patton and Sid repeatedly viewed the motion picture "Patton" in which, during the opening monologue by George C. Scott portraying General Patton, he says, "No one wins a war by dying for his country. You win a war by making the other poor son-of-a-bitch die for his country." Sid was a blood and guts Marine and a blood and guts cop. I know. I partnered with him during his later years.

While still a young detective, Sidney arrested a black man who was dealing drugs on streets and schoolyards of Harlem. The drug dealer sold heroin to black youngsters who were being told over and over again since they were knee high that their lives were hopeless in an America that at best cared little for them, at worst wanted them in prison or dead. They were indoctrinated with this rhetoric by the likes of Charlie Rangel, white liberals and their echo chamber, the mainstream news media. Detective Sid had little compassion for a man who sold drugs to black kids.

This was when Frank Lucas (featured on American Gangster), was a heroin dealer and organized crime boss in New York City - and had operated in Harlem during the late 1960s through the 1970s. Frank Lucas was the king of the Harlem drug trade, bringing in over a million dollars a day. So many heroin addicts were buying from him on 116th Street (Just 8 blocks away from Charlie Rangel's District Office) that he claimed the Transit Authority changed the bus routes to avoid them.

At the time, Charlie Rangel was an up-and-coming political hack in the local Democrat Club and a lawyer more adept at shooting off his mouth than arguing his position on jurisprudence. Rangel ended up representing a drug-pushing punk - whose parents, by the way, were financially very well off. The punk’s dad was a bigtime contributor to the local Democrat Party and a supporter of Rangel for congressman which led to Rangel acting on behalf of an unrepentant drug pusher. Ironically, Rangel later would become chairman of Congress’ Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control.
(A fox in the henhouse?)

Charlie's current bio says, "Over the past forty years, he has led the fight in Congress against drug abuse and trafficking." (That would be from 1970 to the present.)

So Charles Rangel, attorney-at-law, visited my partner Sid in order to get him to back off and perhaps change some of the testimony should the case go to trial. The young detective told Rangel, "No way. That skell sells poison to kids." At that point Charlie Rangel, a known bully in Harlem and northern Manhattan, called Sid an Uncle Tom and got in his face. The six-foot tall detective hauled off and bopped him right in his face and Rangel went down.

After getting up from the floor and brushing himself off, the opulent then-future congressman made some empty threats of retaliation, however Rangel never filed departmental charges of police brutality. Sid believed Charlie Rangel knew if he did he would find himself in a jackpot over witness tampering and he may have had to kiss his political career goodbye.

From a review of "American Gangster"

Frank Lucas lived a glamorous life, hobnobbing with athletes, musicians, and politicians, but Lucas was a ruthless gangster. He was notorious for using the coffins of dead GIs to smuggle heroin into the United States and, before being sentenced to seventy years in prison, he played a major role in the near death of New York City.

In American Gangster, Mark Jacobson's captivating account of the life of Frank Lucas (the basis for a major motion picture) joined other tales of New York City from the past thirty years. The collection features a number of Jacobson's most famous essays, as well as previous unpublished work and recent articles on 9/11 conspiracy theorists, America's #1 escort, and Harlem's own Charles Rangel, the new chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. American Gangster is a vibrant, many-layered portrait of the most fascinating city in the world, by one of the most acclaimed journalists of our time.

"And you couldn't go to Charlie Rangel because he was also working with the Federal Gov't...The only thing he would do was do something unproductive and which he knew was bullspit like bring in more corrupt cops to make the community feel like they were even more in a war zone...It was a Conspiracy starting at the Federal level." Source

Frank Lucas has been quoted as saying that his worth was "something like $52 million", most of it in Cayman Islands banks.

The Cayman Islands? But didn't Charlie...

- - - -Charlie Rangel's Career- - - -
(During the time Frank Lucas was the Drug King Pin New York City)

In 1961 Charlie Rangel was appointed Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York by the U.S. Attorney Robert Morgenthau (by way of the U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy). Charlie stayed in that position for one year.

His interest in politics grew during the Democratic factional dispute in Harlem in 1963. (As a young man, Charlie first got involved in politics and met Carmine DeSapio and was involved with the New Era Democratic Club.)

In 1965 Charlie participated in the Selma to Montgomery marches.

In 1966 Charlie was selected by the Harlem Democrats to run for the New York State Assembly where he served two 2-year terms. He was also general counsel to the National Advisory Commission on Selective Service (The U.S. military draft board - when troops were being sent to Viet Nam. It had been argued that a supposedly disproportionate amount of "Afro-Americans" were being drafted into the war.)

In 1966 Charlie Rangel emerged as a leader among the black legislators in the state, and became politically friendly with Governor of New York Nelson Rockefeller, who arranged for Rangel to run on the Republican AND the Democratic ballot line during his 1968 re-election. Rangel supported the legalization of the "numbers game", saying "For the average Harlemite, playing numbers is moral and a way of life." He also opposed harsher penalties on prostitutes, believing it ineffective.

In 1969 Rangel ran for the Democratic nomination for New York City Council President, finishing last. Rangel co-founded the Congressional Black Caucus (where he has also served as chairman, and of which he continues to be a member)

In 1970 Rangel ran for election to the U.S. House of Representatives, winning with 88% of the vote.

Since 1971 Charles B. Rangel has been a Democratic member of the United States House of Representatives, representing the neighborhoods as Harlem, Spanish Harlem, Washington Heights, Inwood, Morningside Heights, and part of the Upper West Side, as well as a small portion of Queens in the neighborhood of Astoria (predominantly African-American neighborhoods).

Rangel's Congressional Annual Salary during this time in 1971 - $42,400 minimum per year

Rangel had won re-election every two years since then. (His district was numbered the Eighteenth District from 1971 to 1973; the Nineteenth District from 1973 to 1983; and the Sixteenth District from 1983 to 1993; Districts from 1993 to 2006 is unknown to this blogger. Currently 15th District in 2010.)

One of Rangel's first committee assignments was on the House Judiciary Committee where he participated in the impeachment hearings against President Richard Nixon.

Rangel's Congressional Annual Salary in 1975 - $44,600 minimum per year

In January 1975, Frank Lucas' house (across the river from NYC in New Jersey) was raided by a DEA task force and 10 New York Police Department detectives where they found $584,683 cash. He was tried, convicted, and sent to prison for 70 years.

Rangel's Congressional Annual Salary in 1977 - $57,500 minimum per year

Rangel's Congressional Annual Salary in 1979 - $60,660 minimum per year

1981 - Charlie Rangel's Congressional office (near MLK Blvd and 125th) was only a few blocks away from where Barack Obama, Bill Ayers, and Bernardine Dohrn were living. Most of the suspects that were arrested in the October 20, 1981 Brink's robbery were Black Panther Party or Black Liberation Party members, and arrested in Charlie Rangel's district.

Also in 1981, after a little over 5 years in custody, Frank Lucas' 40-year Federal term and 30-year state term were reduced to time served plus lifetime parole. (Political connections?)

In 1984 Frank Lucas' was caught and convicted of trying to exchange one ounce of heroin and $13,000 for one kilogram of cocaine. He was defended by his former prosecutor Richie Roberts and received a sentence of seven years. He was released from prison in 1991.

Charlie Rangel, Frank Lucas, and Bill Ayers - Just six degrees of separation?

* Charlie Rangel's Bio says, "He has resided in a total of two places the whole of his life - the 132nd Street Harlem home in which he was born and raised, and his current apartment down the street on Lenox Avenue." But in his book, he describes it a little differently.

By law, the Securities and Exchange commission expects these companies to report their write downs.

So what's the problem?

I can understand if Congress demands corporate executives to appear before them for hearings if they're receiving taxpayer funding (such as GM or the banks), but shouldn't it be illegal to do so otherwise? And just because they disagree with a political decision or question a law? Don't American companies also have a right to free speech, as recently affirmed by the Supreme Court? A decision that Obama publicly and vehemently ridiculed in his last State of the Union Address?

Mr. Waxman sent AT&T, Caterpillar and Deere a sharp letter saying he wanted top officials from those companies to testify at an April 21 hearing that he has scheduled.

Does he have a legally binding subpoena to compel this guys to Congress? Does he have a search warrant to see their internal e-mail correspondence? Does he have the same authority as a dictator?

(If not, I'd tell him to take a damn hike!)

Where was Waxman when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was going down the tubes because banks were forced to make loans to low-income people for houses they couldn't afford?

Where was Waxman when AIG was writing credit-default-swaps, because he and Chris Dodd let the banks, insurance companies, and the hedge funds run amuck...bringing down the housing market and thus, the economy?

I believe that it should be the other way around, and that members of Congress should be held accountable in hearings.

Did everybody forget how all this first started?

Source:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/30subsidy.html

--------------Other News-----------------

* Franciso Rios, the director of the U of W Social Justice Research Center (a privately endowed center that studies problems of oppression and inequalities among different social groups in society) made the decision to cancel Bill Ayers.

* Expect a U.S. Labor Department report to show 190,000 new jobs were created in March; but he number will be inflated because the government hired temporary workers to conduct the 2010 census. So basicly, unemployment will remain unchanged.

* GOP backlash coming after unemployment benefits blocked

* The Bloomberg news service writes:
"Tea Party Advocates Who Scorn Socialism Want a Government Job". There's just one problem... the headline is glaringly false. what the story actually reports.

* Nothing annoys Norman Podhoretz more when his fellow conservative intellectuals say the same derogatory things about Sarah Palin that are uncannily similar to what many of their forebears once said about Ronald Reagan.

* Obama Steps Up Confrontation - He challenged Republicans who planned to campaign on repealing his health-care bill with, "Go for it." Two days later, he made 15 senior appointments without Senate consent, including a union lawyer whose nomination had been blocked by a filibuster.

Regarding Obama-Care and the Sixteenth Amendment

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Declaration of Independence

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Cogito ergo sum

"I think, therefore I am."

Unalienable rights (natural rights or moral rights) are rights that were bestowed upon me by God, not by any government...and most certainly not by Barack Obama.

I neither have to choose nor not choose to pay taxes. If the government imprisons me for NOT paying taxes, then they do so because I did nothing (I took no action, I did nothing, I just existed - I did not make a conscience decision.)

However, if I exist (by being born), then the only thing that IS certain is death. Whether I choose TO live, or choose NOT to live, no action or decision I make affects the eventual outcome. I may CHOOSE to commit suicide to end my life early, or I may CHOOSE to take a life-saving drug to extend my life...but either way, I would be making a choice. But ALWAYS the outcome is death.

Dying is the ONLY thing one must do - paying taxes is not.

Ben was wrong. The only thing certain is death.

Click on the links below to see Ronald Reagan currency.

Normal Size
Large Size

"I wouldn't mind paying taxes - if I knew they were going to a friendly country." ~ Dick Gregory

"The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax." ~ Albert Einstein

"If Patrick Henry thought that taxation without representation was bad, he should see how bad it is WITH representation." ~ Farmer's Almanac

"It used to be that death and taxes alone were inevitable. Now there's shipping and handling." ~ Bert Murray

"Death and taxes may be certain, but we don't have to die every year." ~ Unknown

March 25, 2010 - Iowa City, Iowa

While Obama was preaching to his loyal followers about the merits of his sleazy health care bill, he took some time during the historic moment to challenged the GOP:

[paraphrased] "I've been hearing a lot about how the Republicans are going to run on a platform in November on repealing healthcare. I say...Go for it!"

Then he shifted into campaign-mode, and as the Great Orator, started railing:

"Leaders of the Republican Party called the passage of this bill Armageddon. Armageddon! End of freedom as we know it...

Then, he quipped like an immature child:

"After I signed the bill, I looked around to see if there were any asteroids falling."

He had a smug and defiant smirk on his face, and didn't look very Presidential. Rather, his expression reminded me more of a spoiled brat that seemed selfishly satisfied with himself...because he just got his own way.

It was very embarrassing to see our "leader" behaving in such an amateurish and unprofessional manner on the world stage.

(He was probably remembering the time when he first moved to New York City and had to sleep in an alley because his room-mate had locked him out.)

You've come a long way since that night in 1981, haven't you Barry? From being nearly homeless to spending 1 trillion dollars with a simple stroke of the pen. All that way in a short 29 years. That really is a historical achievement!

But Mister President, you have no class. Rather than being gracious in your victory and conquest, instead you taunted and insulted the vanquished - (the 75% of your "subjects" who didn't want the forced intrusion of Obama-Care© into their lives.

Now turn around and look meathead...because Armageddon is coming!